This is the Oakland Local Archive. Please visit our current site at http://oaklandlocal.com.
Login has been disabled on the archive.

Oakland seeks to double the number of medical marijuana dispensaries, increase permit fees‏

http://www.flickr.com/photos/29792566@N08/4464358329/in/set-72157623707947002/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/29792566@N08/4464358329/in/set-72157623707947002/

While some cities are seeking to restrict or even impose a temporary moratorium on new medical marijuana dispensaries, Oakland will be considering doubling the number of dispensaries within its jurisdiction.

The city is seeking to increase the number of permitted dispensaries from four to eight and increase the annual dispensary permit fees from $30,000 to $60,000. It also is seeking to require a $5,000 application fee.  The Oakland City Council Public Safety Committee will consider new amendments to the city's medical marijuana code Tuesday night.

Three main reasons for the proposed changes were offered in a document submitted to the Public Safety Committee by Councilmembers Reid and Kaplan.

First, there is a desire to increase competition and diversity among dispensaries. There is a concern that a small number of dispensaries will control the market supply and prices.  The document reads,

"By expanding the number of dispensaries, the city will ensure that it does not promote a situation where the market is dominated by a small number of participants who are able to collectively exert control over supply and the market prices of medical cannabis, and insure that the diversity and different communities of Oakland are served by encouraging that dispensaries reflect and serve the cultural and geographic diversity of Oakland."

Second, there is a desire to meet the demand for business opportunities.  The City Administrator currently has a waiting list of interested applicants and the Small Business Assistance Center gets weekly calls from those interested in opening a dispensary.

Finally, there is a desire for increased fee revenue to meet the costs of permitting and regulating the emerging medical marijuana sector. Currently the application process and the cost of monitoring is not cost-covering.  The proposed application fee of $5,000 will cover the administrative costs of reviewing, scoring, and selecting the permit awardees. 

A doubling of the annual permitting fee from $30,000 to $60,000 will cover the expected costs of staff to monitor, audit, and regulate dispensaries.  These FTEs would include two administrative assistants, two code enforcement inspectors, two tax auditors, .75 tax enforcement officer, and a half-time deputy city attorney.

Last year, Oakland's four permitted dispensaries generated $28 million dollars in gross sales last year, according to the city's Business Tax Revenue Division. 

The proposed changes are separate from this summer's approval of four large-scale cultivation facilities and Measure V on the November ballot, which would increase the tax rate of medical cannabis businesses from the current $18 per $1,000 to $50 per $1,000 of gross receipts.

 

Recommendation to Increase Oakland Medical Cannabis Dispensaries & Permit Fees

Ryan Van Lenning is a writer and organizer focusing on issues of social justice and sustainability. He is also passionate about food justice/urban ag, anti-militarism, and building alternative economies in resilient cities. His work appears in Ecolocalizer, Truthout, Huffington Post, Terrain: Northern California’s Environmental Magazine, and Matador Change. Prior to becoming caught in the web of Bay Area ink-slinging and activism, he taught in the Humanities Department at a community college in Ohio, where he created courses in Environmental Ethics and World Religions: Peace and Violence. He is both a hyper-localist and a globalist, a home-body and travel-addict, and a city explorer and nature aficionado, just a few of the many paradoxes with which he is afflicted. Contact him at ryan@oaklandlocal.com, follow him on twitter @vanlenning, and find more at his blogs Pull the Root, Travelin' Bones, and Rumi and the Cholo.

My antipathy toward Oakland's industrial mj legislation is mostly severe
skepticism about projected tax revenue and jobs creation. So many times,
officials and residents here grasp at essentially get rich quick schemes for
this town, instead of fixing basic problems that make it unattractive to many
businesses.

The projections i've seen are very static, and assume that all you have to do is extrapolate current sales, less adjustment for price drop if statewide legalization occurs, tax the heck out of it and just wait for the big tax bucks
to come rolling in forever.

 Pot entrepreneurs are flexible and markets fluid. There will be fierce
competiton for the same large producers from many areas of CA and NV etc.

Oakland does not have any "natural advantage" to give it a long term edge in
attracting and retaining industrial mj growers.  Land, water and electricity is
expensive here. Taxes, licenses, regulatory standards  will be very high.

Oakland's only "natural" advantage is proximity to customers. That won't be enough in the long run.

Meanwhile it will add to the tragi comic reputation of Oakland as a loser town when companies and big non profits decide where to locate or whether to move out.

(btw, i'm not at all opposed to legalization. I'm a medical user myself.)


Jean  Quan's rhapsodizing over how industrial mj will be our version of striking oil is beyond silly, it's typical of her disconnect from economic reality. Kaplan is somewhat more realistic.


-len raphael

Grows should have to be outdoors, not using electricity for grow lights indoors.