It's a sunny Saturday morning and Jason
Gumato is in North Oakland knocking on the doors of fellow union members,
urging them to vote no on Proposition 32 - a law that would, among other things,
prohibit labor unions in California from using money deducted from their
member’s paychecks to lobby state officeholders.
"I don't mind spending my time doing this," Gumato said. "I have
things I'd like to do with my family today, errands that I need to get done,
but this is just too important to sit out."
On this day, Gumato is just one of many electricians representing the
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers who are going door-to-door in neighborhoods throughout Oakland,
driven by a fear of what Prop. 32 would do to undermine their political power if
approved by voters on Nov. 6.
“It would take away our voice in Sacramento,”
he said, as he leaves a “No on Prop. 32” green tote bag on the doorstep of a
retired IBEW member’s home. “We gotta stand up and say we’re not going to let
that happen.”
If passed, Proposition 32 would prohibit both labor unions and private
corporations from making direct salary contributions to support political
candidates or ballot measures. But with a heavy focus on the elimination of
payroll deductions, analysts contend
the measure equates to an attack on unions, which rely almost exclusively on
member contributions to fund their political campaigns.
Supporters of Prop. 32, meanwhile, have
argued that unions wield too much influence over government decisions via
political contributions.
Recognizing the high stakes, a number of influential and progressive labor
groups in Oakland,
including Gumato’s union, have coalesced to put their collective shoulder to
the grindstone in a quest to defeat Prop. 32.
“It’s so critical that (organized labor) have the ability to speak to our
office holders in the state capitol, so we’re going full throttle,” Josie
Camacho, executive secretary-treasure for the Alameda Labor Council, said.
Oakland, home to some of the most powerful union organizations in California,
such as the California Nurses Association and a plethora of strong,
progressive, grassroots advocacy and activist groups, now finds itself at the center of the campaign to defeat Prop. 32.
"Oakland
is definitely important,” confirmed Phillip Ung, a spokesman for California
Common Cause, which has come out strongly against the measure. “Most of the no
votes will come from Oakland, the (rest of the)
Bay Area and Los Angeles."
But when it comes to political activism, Ung said, Oakland stands head and shoulders above the
rest.
"Activism is part of the fabric of Oakland,"
he said. "You just don't get that in Sacramento."
In some ways, the organizing efforts against Prop. 32 reconfirm Oakland
– a city of roughly 400,000 that was recently referred
to in the New York Times as “the last refuge of radical America” – as the heartbeat of progressive
politics in California
today. Its large labor
unions are strong and organized; residents, many of them working-class
poor, consistently vote progressive and segments of the community have shown a
willingness to speak out or demonstrate
publicly when such actions are deemed necessary.
Last fall, Oakland
had one of the most visible and active
Occupy movements in the country. Oakland
was also the city that spawned the Black Panther Party and other radical
political organizations in the 1960s and 1970s.
Even Oakland Mayor Jean Quan cut her political teeth as a prominent University of California, Berkeley, activist and
later as a labor union organizer. A few days before being sworn in as mayor,
Quan demonstrated
in front of the downtown Rite Aide in solidarity with drugstore workers who
were striking.
“We have no problem speaking up,” Camacho said. “We have no problem telling
elected officials and others that it’s important to support working families in
Oakland and in California.”
DeAnn McEwen, co-president of the California Nurses Association, located in
downtown Oakland,
said the city is a perfect fit for the powerful union.
"It's a working class town that has a lot of fight," she said.
"It's proud of its labor history and people here would be greatly affected
if Prop. 32 was allowed to pass. [We would be] put at a disadvantage, when it
comes to advocating for our members and our patients.”
The bid to defeat Prop. 32 has led labor unions, grassroots groups and
faith-based organizations in the city to work in a coordinated effort, sharing
resources and strategies.
“This is not just about what happens to labor unions,” Nikki Fortunato
Bas, executive director of the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy, said. “The
reason why so many groups are getting together to defeat this measure is
because we know that it would be detrimental to the poor, detrimental to
families and detrimental to the middle class.”
Prop. 32 is just the latest in a series of similar state ballot measures
proposed in recent years that have sought to curb organized labor’s political
influence in Sacramento.
In 2005, then-Gov. Arnold
Schwarzenegger called a special election to pass a series of measures,
including Proposition 75, which would have made unions require permission from
members before having union dues withheld for political purposes. The measure
was rejected, and the California Nurses Association played a significant role
in its defeat.
In 1998, then-Gov. Pete Wilson
supported Proposition 226 – a similar “paycheck protection” measure - which
was also defeated.
The current battle has awakened the city's labor leaders out of their slumber,
said Camacho.
“Prop 32 has gotten us off our asses," Camacho said. "It’s really gotten us to go out into the
field and talk to our members, form important alliances and really work
together in an important way.”
As the election draws near, Oakland labor groups
and progressive organizations say they believe California voters will see Prop. 32 for what
it is.
“I think we’re doing a good job of telling voters why Prop. 32 is bad,” Camacho
said. “I think voters are beginning to understand that this measure is unfair
and would give corporations and big business more power in Sacramento.”
For his part, Ung said he also thinks the measure will be defeated on Nov. 6, but
isn’t taking anything for granted.
"(Prop 32) is going to lose, but it's going to be close because now you're
seeing a lot of money from the yes side coming in from out-of-state,” Ung said.