Isaiah Tage has big dreams after college.
If you are a person of color under the age of 30 living in Oakland, there's a good chance you will spend this summer unemployed with few long term job prospects ahead.
This story is Part 1 of our Living in Debt series.
"It's been hard," soft-spoken, 21-year-old Louis King said. "Being a young black male, when you go out looking for a job, a lot of people just look at you like you're just a kid on the street. A street kid who probably won't come to work, and I'm really the opposite. I'm very respectful, but people don't take the time to see that."
King, a student at Hayward's Chabot College who always dresses in a jacket and tie for interviews, said he's willing to work hard, but it's frustrating trying to find a job.
"People say it's the economy, but I just don't know," he said.
Hurting for jobs
Oakland is hurting for jobs and no where is unemployment more dire than with the youth population. In some neighborhoods, the unemployment rate for those between 18- and 24-years-old is as high as 30 to 40 percent, experts say.
On the whole, Oakland's unemployment rate is at 17 percent, higher than the state's 12.1 percent.
"People are really hurting now," said Matthew A. Graves, Jr., executive director of Alameda County Youth Development Inc. "You now have an older population that's competing with a younger generation for entry level jobs, just because they've been unemployed for so long. So the few jobs that's out there that would of gone to a younger person, is now going to someone older."
And the stress for money is real, Oakland youth say.
"I really do feel that pressure, " said Isaiah Tage, 18, a student at the College of Alameda. Tage is the first in his family to go college. "I feel like I gotta make it, I got to help my family, I want them to be proud of me."
Sometimes that stress and pressure for money leads to wrong choices.
"A lot of us are trying not to be another stereotype out here in the streets," King said. "I mean, you don't want to go out sell drugs and rob and stuff. You're actually trying to look for a job. When you don't have a job you can't support yourself, help your family, it's like, what do you have left to fall back on?"
Long term, if the city of Oakland is to push its way out of its current financial gloom, it must produce stable jobs with livable wages for those that have suffered the most during the city's financial downturn, including Oakland's youth, experts say.
"We don't want to have a recovery that benefits the same people," Jennifer Lin, a research director at EBASE, said. "We want to make sure we have a recovery that is broad, that reaches young people, people who were previously incarcerated, people with just GED or a high school diploma. We want to make sure as a city that we're investing in economic sectors that benefit everyone."
One area where many believe the city can grow jobs for young residents and others is at the former Oakland Army Base.
A dream yet realized
The former Oakland Army Base can sometimes seem like a mirage of good fortune.
The site – co-owned by the city and the Port of Oakland – is an enormous chunk of land, the size of about 200 football fields, right at the base of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. Roughly 365 acres, it was first opened in 1941 and served as a major military hub until it was officially closed in 1999 – part of a wave of military base closures across the country.
The potential for the old base is great. If done right, the base can become an enormous economic boom for the city and the port, with thousands of jobs in a variety of fields including construction, maritime and the green industry, along with areas like technology research and development.
But up until recently, for many it's been a frustrating, start and stop development process for the site. Over the year, previous attempts to develop the base, including plans for an Indian casino, an A's baseball stadium and a movie studio (run by Keenen Ivory Wayans) all failed.
"It's been a very long road and a very frustrating road because we've been quite close to development, but there's been a number of challenges," Councilwoman Nancy Nadel, who represents West Oakland where the base is located, said.
But now, both the port and City Council say that this time the base development is moving at a good clip.
Shovel-ready projects
Currently, the city and the port are in a public-private partnership with AMB/CCG to redevelop the site into a large-scale industrial district. City officials have said that there will be shovel-ready projects in "12 to 18 months."
Port of Oakland officials expect the army base will play an important role in its future growth.
"We're excited about developing the army base area," said Isaac Kos-Red, a spokesman with the Port of Oakland. "It's going to be play a key role in the port's ability to grow its export business, for example. We expect great things."
Nadel agrees that the base represents exciting opportunities for the city.
"(The army base) is an important piece of real estate that everyone has great hopes for," Nadel said. "I think that long term, we will be providing some good options for Oaklanders, young and old alike."
NEXT: Part 2, Can Tony Smith turn around Oakland public schools? See our full Living in Debt series.
Special thanks to David Cohn and the Spot.us community for helping to make this project possible.
There was an informative recent NPR series on the efforts of various local governments for "economic development" .
While every state and local govt hopes to achieve the holy grail of encouraging the growth and long term local presence of total new businesses, it's mostly a zero sum game with one local losing out to another.
Listen to that series and you'll realize that Oakland is up against a combo of local governments focused like head seeking missils on job development, who've hired experienced slick business development people. Add to that some of those locales offer cheap labor costs, cheap rents/land, cheap utilitiy rates, tax breaks, low regulatory hurdles, plus educated workers in a lower cost of living area.
The limits of our situation were illustrated by the city council members in recent years chasing after solar panel manufactures (went to Fremont then quickly shifted to China), bike repair (that never got off the ground), solar power and home insulation services (real estate crash), and industrial dope growing.
Oakland officials are neither focused, able to offer any tax breaks, and handicapped by our high cost, high regulatory situation. Add to that the list of requirements that we impose such as how much vehicle traffic will be generated, will they pay union wages and benefits, what their carbon footprint is etc. and you have a difficult situation at best.
Add to that mix, a city council consisting of people who have never managed, let alone started and grown any business bigger than a hobby, but who think they know how to do economic development and you have a recipe for expensive failures.
In our situation, we'd be best to get out of the economic development business all together, by putting city owned properties out to bid for lease or sale to the highest bidder. Cut the costs spent on "economic development" and focus on providing high quality basic city services to make this city attractive to employers. Streamline and rationalize the zoning procedures to give new business's certainty about current situation and the situation they face if they thrive and want to expand here.
len raphael, cpa
temescal
To put the impossible task of City directed economic development in perspective, look at the stats for the percentage of new businesses that survive the first 5 years. It's minuscule.
So to expect any city official to be able to pick winners and losers when deciding whom to spend RDA money on would be difficult for even the most successful venture capitalist, let alone our motley crew of bureaucrats and public sector attorneys.
The young people who spoke up at recent CC hearing against the gang injunctions understandably equate City "programs" with job creation because the only new jobs they've seen here other than restaurants and vanished construction jobs, have been jobs working as staff for City programs.
Arguably, since the City found ways to spend RDA money on all kinds of General Fund purposes under the guise of econ develpment, it should instead spend RDA money on tutoring for kids or 6 day a week charter closely monitored schools in Oakland to compensate for other systemic weakness in OUSD and families.
That wouldn't create jobs, but at least would create well educated kids who could leave Oakland to get decent jobs, instead of throwing the RDA money away on developers and investors who already live outside of Oakland.
-len raphael, cpa
temesacl
As long as Oakland and California tolerate the illegal population taking all the jobs that kids used to take nothing will change. But I wonder, since we have made a segment of the population 'comfortable" with welfare programs I have doubts that many of the youths would take these entry level jobs if the illegals were not available to work these positions. The government creates the problems, then try's to fix them ignoring the origional problems they created that caused the situation in the first place.