Oakland City Hall
Tonight's City Council meeting will conclude with the final reading of the hotly debated zoning and building height update. Here are five less well known decisions to watch:
7.4 Locations of New Parking Meters
This is the second and final reading of this ordinance to "add street segments to the established parking meter zones," or in other words: allow the city to charge for parking on more streets. The first reading was on March 1 and because this item is now on the consent calendar, one can reasonably expect it to pass.
In a move expected to generate an additional $267,000 per year, the city will vote between two plans to add parking meters throughout the city. No more than a quarter of these new meters are allowed to be placed in District 1 (North Oakland, Councilwoman Jane Brunner's District), to ensure the districts bear a more proportional burden of these new fees.
Areas under consideration for additional parking meters:
District 1:
District 2:
District 3:
District 4:
District 5:
Free parking and access for residents are typically positioned in contrast to sorely needed city revenue. District 4 Councilwoman Libby Schaaf wrote an editorial in the Oakland Tribune, all but challenging the city of Oakland to think beyond this zero sum game. She discussed the usefulness of parking meters to keep parking available where demand exceeds capacity and how little sense it makes to meter parking on streets with lower parking demand.
Do you think people should have to pay to park on these streets?
S-7.19, S-7.20 Purchase of properties in East Oakland for redevelopment
This item will allow the City Redevelopment Agency to move forward and purchase two properties from private owners. The properties are:
3550 Foothill Blvd.
711 71st Ave.
Do you think the city should spend this money with so much uncertainty surrounding redevelopment agencies? What would you like to see happen to these spaces?
S-7.21 Broadway Street Car Transit Study
What began as the independent study project of a Stanford University student is now ready to apply for a $300,000 study from the California Department of Transportation, or CalTrans.
Ultimately the street car is intended to connect Jack London Square all the way to Piedmont Avenue or MacArthur BART along Broadway. The interim Free Broadway Shuttle (the "B"), is in many ways a proof of concept model for the proposed Oakland Streetcar Project, and more than 2,000 people road the B every weekday. Supporters claim that a more permanent service would attract more serious investment along the corridor. Also, after construction, a street car is cheaper than a bus.
Read more about the street car on its official website or in the San Francisco Chronicle.
S-7.23 Overtime Usage - Oakland Police Department
A few recent East Bay Express articles (Feb. 23 and March 9) discuss the Oakland Police Department charging event coordinators and business owners steep rates to have officers at their events, even though the number of officers required for each event is determined (without oversight) by the Oakland Police Department.
In the online agenda packet, this Council item includes a report of overtime pay for four departments from the middle of 2009. Perhaps the wrong report was attached and we can expect more recent figures soon? In any case, this likely won't be the last we hear on this issue.
9.1-9.3 Assessment of Liens
Only three items are on the consent calendar portion of the agenda - meaning they will require a vote tonight. Each item asks the Council how to proceed with businesses and individuals who are behind on a specific type of payments.
The payments are:
The Council will likely vote to conduct a public hearing and let the public help it decide how to proceed with these businesses and property owners. The city will probably decide to place a lien on each offending business or property. A lien means that if the business or property is ever sold, the new buyer has to pay these backed taxes and fees.
How to get involved
The City Council meeting will begin at 5:30 p.m. on the second floor of City Hall at 1 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza. You can also watch the meetings on KTOP (local channel 10) and streaming online.
Residents need to participate, instead of just watching (KTOP is the place for that) and leaving important city policy up to the pro's and special interests. Participation helps our elected officials make painful decisions that they know they should make but can't without support.
=======================
After more than two years of city planning staff work, public meetings and
technical working groups consisting of ULTRA, STAND, PANIL, RCPC, Oakland
Builders Alliance, various local architects etc., a final version as proposed by
Councilmember Jane Brunner was approved by the City Council at the last meeting in February. Law requires a second vote at a subesquent meeting for adoption.
Jane Brunner's proposed height and setback rules for Bway and Tele, were 60 feet at major street intersections, mostly 45 feet in between major intersections where lower density residential is immediately adjacent/behind commercial zones.
A few sections of Telegraph were limited to lower heights for historical
reasons.
Considering that most new commercial building would be required to have 15 foot high retail first floors, and the subsequent stories would normally be about 10 feet each, 45 feet = 4 stories; 60 feet =5.5 stories etc.
State mandated density bonuses for affordable housing would add to that. If
Oakland adopts density bonus for market rate buildings as was discussed by
Rebecca Kaplan at last meeting, then effective limits would be 60 to 75 feet,
depending. 75 would be similar to the building at Bway and Grand with Ozumo.
No one was thrilled by the final proposal: ULTRA and some developers/owners
wanted 60 and 75 feet over much of the affected area, STAND and PANIL wanted 45 and 30 feet.
A month ago, before the first council vote, some of my neighbors collected 70
signatures from residents close to Bway in a couple of afternoons on a petition
supporting 45 foot limits on Bway.
Sometime after the first council vote, pressure was brought to bear on city
council members to reject Brunner's compromise proposal and send Bway and
Telegraph back to staff and assumedly more community meetings.
While my neighbors and I preferred somewhat lower limits, especially along 49th where there are shade issues, we can live with the proposal.
Our expectation is because of density bonuses, practical heights could easily
turn out to be 60 feet in many locations, but if we start with 60 the final
heights could be oppressive 75 foot heights on the shallow Bway and Tele lots.
My understanding is that the city council has to vote yea or nay on the entire
city rezoning as a package tonight. If it votes nay, then Bway and or Tele can
be broken out separately for more meetings, staff time, council votes etc. The
approval vote process would start anew on the resulting two or more packages. So two more voting sessions for each package.
If you support Jane Brunner's proposal, please go online to the city website and fill out a "speaker's card" and mark it as "in favor". If you're like most of
us, you don't have the time or energy to go to the meeting and sit for hours
waiting to speak. So check the box on the online card "decline to speak"
If oppose her proposal and want much higher density and heights than proposed, you will have plenty of opportunity to get that by supporting Rebecca Kaplan's density bonuses for all new construction.
http://www.oaklandnet.com/cityclerk/speakerupdate.asp to go right to the card.
Or for a full explanation of the speaker card (worth skipping)
http://www2.oaklandnet.com/Government/o/CityCouncil/s/SpeakCouncilMeeting/index.\
htm
Agenda item = 10.
Comm/Council Name = council member name
Comm/council date = Tuesday 3/15/2011.
In favor
Chose speak or do not wish to speak.
Then hit “select”. You will get a confirmation. Print that out or copy and
paste it where you can find it if you go to the meeting to prove you registered.
This item will start at 630pm at the earliest. If you can’t get there till
later, most likely you can still speak.
See the agenda at http://oakland.legistar.com/calendar.aspx
-len raphael,
temescal
This is the best way to get grass roots people involved, thanks oakland local and ruth miller for posting the agenda like this,