This is the Oakland Local Archive. Please visit our current site at http://oaklandlocal.com.
Login has been disabled on the archive.

Federal receivership of Oakland Police Department likely to cost big money

Photo by Jennifer Inez Ward

The Oakland Police Department is staring down the barrel of a possible federal takeover, a potential action that could have a huge financial impact on the city.

If the city fails to come into compliance with a Negotiated Settlement Agreement or reach a deal with the plaintiffs of the Rider case, Oakland could spend an ever-growing amount related to its police force. In addition, the lack of local control would be a devastating blow to community policing.

Oakland will likely foot the bill for any federal receivership. Already the department is paying millions to the federal monitors charged with overseeing the negotiated settlement agreement with plaintiffs in the case.

According to Oakland Police Sergeant Christopher Bolton, the city has spent more than $5 million on federal monitors charged with making sure the department is in compliance with the NSA.

Overall, the department's payout for claims and lawsuits has cost Oakland a lot of money. The city attorney's office said that in a four-year fiscal period, $18.3 million were spent on police payouts. The last fiscal year, 2010-11, was the worst at $7.7 million.

"This NSA has been very expensive for the city," Jim Chanin, an attorney with the plaintiffs said. "And if receivership happens, it's going to be even worse. Receivership will dwarf those payments."

Dec. 13 is the day when the city may find out if federal controls will tighten on its police department. Ninth Circuit Judge Thelton Henderson is overseeing reform measures spelled out in a 2003 agreement that settled the Riders police misconduct case.

Chanin said that he doesn't want the entire department to be taken over. Instead, diversions like OPD's Internal Affairs would go into receivership.

"We have no intention at all of asking that the entire police department be run by someone else," he said.

However the way it does shape up, the implications will impact community policing in Oakland.

"Think about how this money could be used to build a better relationship with the community," Nwamaka Agbo, campaign director for the Ella Baker Center said. "That's what is so disheartening."

Jeffrey Daniel Cash, a member of the Community Police Advisory Board, said that receivership could also tangle the already frayed relationship police have with the community.

"It could further disconnect OPD from the community and community control," he said.

Cash said that CPAB has not publicly held any discussions on the matter. OPD also has not approached the volunteer board about the receivership issue.

Also read: Federal receivership: The great unknown

A writer and photographer, Jennifer Inez Ward has been documenting Oakland neighborhoods for more than 10 years. A graduate of UC Berkeley’s Graduate School of Journalism, she focuses on the uniqueness and beauty of everyday life in a city that is too often overlooked for its treasures and pleasures. Throughout the years, Jennifer has had the honor of showcasing her work at a number of venues, including a permanent loan of images that are displayed on the front wall of Barnes and Nobel in Jack London Square. Jennifer is a featured artist documented in “Images of America: Black Artists in Oakland."

Federal Receivership "likely" to cost big money. First it is not fact based at least do your research and properly compare the price of police crime against innocent people versus the price of stopping police crimes against innocent people. Also- That is a crap headline, the truth is a bad criminal police department costs big money, if taxpayers wanted to save on the budget they would invest in equity for all and an equal application of law instead of extra-judicial killings and racially biased policing and prosecution. For your entrertainment zine to post this headline is irresponsible journalism and also denys the culpability of your average cognitively disassociated reader in failing to ensure a police department that would not commit crimes against innocent humans. It should read- federal receivership a small price to pay for years and decades of  taxpayer profiting from inequity and/while boldly allowing these criminals with badges to operate with immunity and impunity on taxpayer dimes and time,  the good people of Oakland should be ashamed in allowing this disgrace of a police department to reach this level of disgusting violation of law and human rights.

But then again your paper is well known for being a urban blight on real progress, a tool of the oppressing class, gentrifyers, and other benficiaries of inequity, so it makes perfect sense you would prepetuate this trash pretending to be local news.

 

Um, thanks for sharing your views? Seems like your anger at the police department is spilling out over at Oakland Local.

Sounds like someone's got a bad case of the over exagerations. Don't feed the trolls.