The Oakland Police Department is
staring down the barrel of a possible federal takeover, a potential action that
could have a huge financial impact on the city.
If the city fails to come into compliance with a
Negotiated Settlement Agreement or reach a deal with the plaintiffs of the Rider case, Oakland could spend an
ever-growing amount related to its police force. In addition, the lack of
local control would be a devastating blow to community policing.
Oakland will likely foot the bill for any federal receivership.
Already the department is paying millions to the federal monitors charged with
overseeing the negotiated settlement agreement with plaintiffs in the case.
According to Oakland Police Sergeant Christopher
Bolton, the city has spent more than $5 million on federal monitors charged
with making sure the department is in compliance with the NSA.
Overall, the department's payout for claims and
lawsuits has cost Oakland
a lot of money. The city attorney's office said that in a four-year fiscal
period, $18.3 million were spent on police payouts. The last fiscal year,
2010-11, was the worst at $7.7 million.
"This NSA has been very expensive for the
city," Jim Chanin, an attorney with the plaintiffs said. "And if
receivership happens, it's going to be even worse. Receivership will dwarf
those payments."
Dec. 13 is the day when the city may find out if
federal controls will tighten on its police department. Ninth Circuit Judge
Thelton Henderson is overseeing reform measures spelled out in a 2003 agreement
that settled the Riders police misconduct case.
Chanin said that he doesn't want the entire
department to be taken over. Instead, diversions like OPD's Internal Affairs
would go into receivership.
"We have no intention at all of asking that the entire police
department be run by someone else," he said.
However the way it does shape up, the implications will
impact community policing in Oakland.
"Think about how this money could be used to build
a better relationship with the community," Nwamaka Agbo, campaign director for the Ella Baker Center said. "That's what is so
disheartening."
Jeffrey Daniel Cash, a member of the Community Police
Advisory Board, said that receivership could also tangle the already frayed
relationship police have with the community.
"It could further disconnect OPD from the
community and community control," he said.
Cash said that CPAB has not publicly held any
discussions on the matter. OPD also has not approached the volunteer board
about the receivership issue.
Also read: Federal receivership: The great unknown
Federal Receivership "likely" to cost big money. First it is not fact based at least do your research and properly compare the price of police crime against innocent people versus the price of stopping police crimes against innocent people. Also- That is a crap headline, the truth is a bad criminal police department costs big money, if taxpayers wanted to save on the budget they would invest in equity for all and an equal application of law instead of extra-judicial killings and racially biased policing and prosecution. For your entrertainment zine to post this headline is irresponsible journalism and also denys the culpability of your average cognitively disassociated reader in failing to ensure a police department that would not commit crimes against innocent humans. It should read- federal receivership a small price to pay for years and decades of taxpayer profiting from inequity and/while boldly allowing these criminals with badges to operate with immunity and impunity on taxpayer dimes and time, the good people of Oakland should be ashamed in allowing this disgrace of a police department to reach this level of disgusting violation of law and human rights.
Um, thanks for sharing your views? Seems like your anger at the police department is spilling out over at Oakland Local.
Sounds like someone's got a bad case of the over exagerations. Don't feed the trolls.