Image of Mehserle from New America Media, http://newamericamedia.org/2011/05/mehserle-shooting-of-oscar-grant-considered-a-non-v
Due
to the classification of being a non-violent felon, Johannese Mehserle could walk
free in the next few weeks after serving less than one calendar year of
his prison sentence. Because California penal code does not classify involuntary manslaughter
as a “violent” or “serious” offense, Johannes Mehserle, the convicted
killer of Oscar Grant, could be released as early as mid-June of this
year, after serving less than one year behind bars.
But while the
Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department (LASD) lists June 1 as the date
for a court hearing to schedule Mehserle’s release, that hearing may or
may not happen, depending on who you talk to.
According to Luis
Patino, a communications consultant for the California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), the purpose of the June 1 hearing
is to review Mehserle’s “…sentencing credits, and determine whether or
not his release date is correct. At this point, the release date is
projected to be the middle of June.”
The LASD has jurisdiction
over the Men's Central Jail where Mehserle has been held since July 8,
2010, after a jury found him guilty of involuntary manslaughter in the
death of Grant, who was shot by Mehserle while lying face-down on an
Oakland Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) platform on New Year’s Eve of
2009. Mehserle claimed to have mistaken his service weapon for a
taser-gun.
According to the sheriff’s website, Mehserle’s hearing
is set for 8:30 a.m. before Judge Robert Perry. However, Connie
Fernandes, an assistant to Mehserle’s defense attorney Michael Rains,
stated that the hearing was “not going to happen.”
Further details were not available from Rains’ office as of press time.
An inquiry was made about the discrepancy with the court clerk. However, that call was not returned by press time.
Per
the California Penal Code, Section 4019, which was amended and approved
by former Governor Schwarzenegger in October 2009, “certain prisoners
shall earn one day of credit for every one day served either in the
state prison or in a local facility prior to delivery to the state
prison.”
The “certain prisoners” are those convicted of
non-violent felonies or those convicted of felonies that are not
considered to be serious.
Section 667.5c of the California Penal
Code lists those felonies that are considered to be violent and Section
1192.7c lists those considered to be serious. Involuntary manslaughter,
the crime that Mehserle was convicted of, is not listed among them.
Patino
says that involuntary manslaughter is indeed considered to be a
non-violent offense but that other factors weigh in on the calculation
of a state prisoner’s sentence: “The type of crime committed, the
classification of the crime, the time it is committed, the laws in
effect at that time, interpretation of the law, etc.,” said Patino.
Due
to the classification of being a non-violent felon, Mehserle could walk
free in the next few weeks after serving less than one calendar year of
his prison sentence.
In Oakland and in Los Angeles, where
Mehserle’s trial took place and he is currently being held, reaction to
the news of Mehserle’s classification was met with shock and anger among
activists and observers of the case.
“I don’t know how much
more violent you can get than killing someone!” said Tiah Starr, an
organizer with the October 22nd Coalition against Police Brutality, one
of the founding organizations of the Los Angeles Coalition for Justice
for Oscar Grant.
“It’s insane that he only did a year in jail and Oscar Grant is dead ... it just makes no sense to me,” said Starr.
Sheilagh
Polk, a former Los Angeles resident who moved to Oakland four years
ago, felt that the charge of involuntary manslaughter never should have
been an option. “Mehserle … should have been convicted of second degree
murder; he pulled out his gun, cocked it, pulled the trigger and
executed an unarmed, young black man with full confidence that he would
get away with it. And he did,” she said.
Davey D, a journalist
and 20-year resident of the Bay Area, felt that the non-violent
designation was just one more indicator of the justice system’s failure
to work for African Americans. “At the end of the day, this is just a
repudiation of black life,” he said. “That’s what this all boils down
to – the verdict, the picking of the jury, the sentencing – this is all a
refusal to acknowledge and see black life as something that is
valuable.”
Whenever the sentencing review hearing is held,
Patino says, as a matter of policy the CDCR will not release the
specific date and time of Mehserle’s release. “It’s for the safety of
the inmate, our employees, and many times, the public,” he said.
>>>Section 667.5c of the California Penal Code lists those felonies that are considered to be violent and Section 1192.7c lists those considered to be serious. Involuntary manslaughter, the crime that Mehserle was convicted of, is not listed among them.<<<
Why is this a problem???? Oh,, because it involves a white man that killed a black man. But wait isn't that racist???? These statutes have always been the case nothing new, it wasn't created to release Mehserle early. Yes, he could benefit, but it's the law. We shouldn't be changing laws to benefit any one group or another, any one situation or another.